Obama Teams Up With Foreign Media and Governments to Destroy Second Amendment
In the three weeks since the Sandy Hook school shooting, Americans have been browbeaten by a plethora of foreigners in the media keen to lecture them on how their constitutional right to keep and bear arms should be eviscerated.
It started with British CNN host Piers Morgan, who seized upon the tragedy within hours to push his fanatical anti-second amendment agenda, calling for a British-style total gun ban. This eventually led to aÂ White House petitioncalling for Morgan to be deported which went viral and has thus far attracted over 100,000 signatures.
As USA Today highlights, the Morgan controversy served to enflame a global gun control debate with foreign media personalities around the world lecturing Americans on what rights they should be able to exercise.
âIn news outlets around the world, editorials, news stories and columns demand American gun control. Our political debates have gone global and American conservatives are outnumbered in a way few even realize. Factor in the impact of worldwide social media and the Internet has given our home-grown liberals an incredible advantage and distorted what should be a uniquely American debate,â wrote Dan Gainor, noting that quasi-state owned media outlets like the BBC and Qatarâs Al-Jazeera were also demanding Americans be stripped of their inherent second amendment rights.
It was then the turn of the Communist Chinese government to jump on board the anti-gun bandwagon.Â An editorial in the official state-run media front XinhuaÂ called on Barack Obama to declare âwarâ on the second amendment and disarm U.S. citizens as soon as possible.
Chinaâs rhetorical assault on the second amendment was particularly ironic given that it was Chairman Mao himself who said, âpolitical power grows out of the barrel of a gun.â Maoâs policies were responsible for the deaths of 40-70 million people, the vast majority of whom had no means of defending themselves against the genocide overseen by Mao and his henchmen during the Cultural Revolution.
Not to be outdone, the Kremlin-funded Russia Today television network also lined up to attack gun rights. During an interview with former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Paul Craig Roberts,Â an RT anchor repeatedly interrupted RobertsÂ when he refused to agree that the Sandy Hook massacre should lead to draconian gun control laws in America.
âI was surprised to see that RT Moscowâs interest was to spread the official US story of the shootings and to ask me if I thought âassault weaponsâ would be banned as a consequence,âÂ said Roberts, noting that RT refused to acknowledge Robertsâ attempt to cite media reports that confirmed Adam Lanzaâs assault rifle was left in his car and was not even used during the massacre.
In aÂ separate discussionÂ about the aftermath of the Sandy Hook massacre, a Russia Today host and an RT editor tried to savage Alex Jonesâ impartiality by accusing Infowars of being money driven.
Russia Today accusing another media organization of allowing their accuracy and bias to be dictated by finance is somewhat rich given thatÂ RT is funded to the tune of billions of dollars by three term dictator Vladimir Putinâs governmentÂ and wasÂ conceived by Putinâs press spokespersonÂ Aleksei Gromo.
Dan Gainor notes that RT is âthe voice for the Putin regime,â and that it seized upon the Sandy Hook shooting to launch an exercise in âAmerica-bashingâ which portrayed the United States as being âfilled with meth labs, murders and anti-government opponents.â
Federally-funded NPRÂ also showcased how Australians were calling on Americans to be disarmed, despite the fact thatÂ as the Wall Street Journal documented, âStrict gun laws in Great Britain and Australia havenât made their people noticeably safer, nor have they prevented massacres.â
It makes a serious statement when virtually every major global media outfit in the world is on board with the Obama administrationâs aggressive campaign to eviscerate the second amendment, and serves as a reminder that Americans are under ideological assault from political enemies both foreign and domestic.